Wednesday, July 23rd 2014, 1:35am UTC+2

You are not logged in.

  • Login

Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .

91

Friday, April 22nd 2011, 1:58am

Not sure if it's been said because I've not been that active on the forums of late but I'd like to see.

Delay effect: Stereo width to the ping pongs and the ability to modulate it. Some times I want my ping pong to ping and pong but not be full left and right.

92

Thursday, May 12th 2011, 2:26pm

+ 1 you've got my vote pal

I like all the ideas The Outsider mentioned.

93

Friday, May 13th 2011, 4:12pm

Yes, a step sequenzer would be great, but if it can not be made i would like to program user's pattern arpeggios with the front pannel (without the use of virus control)

94

Friday, May 13th 2011, 6:57pm

ARP glide like TB-303
YES YES YES & euhhhh YES!!!!!!!!!
and fur sure a STABLE FIRMWARE
because since 2006 i got it i can't remember a really 100 working system ahahahaha

womb

Unregistered

95

Sunday, May 15th 2011, 10:40pm

Internal volume meter....so we can tell when distortion occurs


and......"Chord/s" category


AND BETTER MANUAL

96

Monday, May 30th 2011, 1:43pm

Virus Control Multi Part Save and Export Plus Importing the Parts and Automation the parts From old project..
DAW: Cubase 6.5.4 (64 Bit)
OS:Windows 7 (64 Bit) And OSX 10.7.5
Virus TI OS:4.5.3
---------------------------
Synth : Virus Ti Desktop,Virus Ti Snow,Nord Stage ex88,Roland Mc-909
PC : Core i7 870 ,8.0 GB Ram
Mac : Macbook Pro Mid 2012 ,Core i7 ,8GB Ram

97

Saturday, June 25th 2011, 1:23pm

Patch-Randomizer

Please, do make the store-function of the patch-randomizer work!
It's been years we are waiting for that!

SimonO

Trainee

Posts: 55

Location: Wellington, New Zealand

  • Send private message

98

Saturday, June 25th 2011, 11:00pm

I presume that this thread was given the title "OS 5 Feature Requests" by The_Outsider because in the thread's first post he made several unrelated requests. Some of the replies, especially early on in the thread, commented on The_Outsider's original requests. That is of course entirely appropriate. But other replies have introduced new requests that are unrelated to ones that had previuosly been discussed in the thread.

May I suggest that, despite the all-embracing-seeming title of this thread, a new thread be started within the Feature Requests sub-forum for each new request (unless, perhaps, you have a long list of them, as The_Outdiser did)? After all, that is the purpose of the Feature Requests sub-forum. I suggest that whether or not you think your request is likely to be implemented in TIOS 4.x or 5 should have no bearing on this, again despite the reference the reference to OS 5 in this thread's title,

Starting a new thread within Feature Requests for each new request is the approach I have taken myself. It has several advantages. It more easily draws the attention of forum browsers (including, most importantly, Access Music staffers!) to new feature requests. It encourages any subsequent discussion in the new thread to remain focused on the new request. In particular, it makes it easy for other musicians to "vote" for the new request, to hopefully help get it some priority, by posting a simple reply saying something like "I too would like to see this new feature" or "I vote for this" or even, as I have seen several times, just "+1".

Simon
Virus TI2 Polar | TIOS 4.5.3.00 | Pro Tools 9.0.2 | Windows 7 SP 1

99

Monday, June 27th 2011, 6:03pm

I presume that this thread was given the title "OS 5 Feature Requests" by The_Outsider because in the thread's first post he made several unrelated requests. Some of the replies, especially early on in the thread, commented on The_Outsider's original requests. That is of course entirely appropriate. But other replies have introduced new requests that are unrelated to ones that had previuosly been discussed in the thread.

May I suggest that, despite the all-embracing-seeming title of this thread, a new thread be started within the Feature Requests sub-forum for each new request (unless, perhaps, you have a long list of them, as The_Outdiser did)? After all, that is the purpose of the Feature Requests sub-forum. I suggest that whether or not you think your request is likely to be implemented in TIOS 4.x or 5 should have no bearing on this, again despite the reference the reference to OS 5 in this thread's title,

Starting a new thread within Feature Requests for each new request is the approach I have taken myself. It has several advantages. It more easily draws the attention of forum browsers (including, most importantly, Access Music staffers!) to new feature requests. It encourages any subsequent discussion in the new thread to remain focused on the new request. In particular, it makes it easy for other musicians to "vote" for the new request, to hopefully help get it some priority, by posting a simple reply saying something like "I too would like to see this new feature" or "I vote for this" or even, as I have seen several times, just "+1".

Simon


+1 ;)

Similar threads