The post was CONVENIENTLY removed lol.... It was on this forum where a rep for your company said they were looking into it. No matter.....
It matters to me. I don't like the idea of an accusation which is based on a post which was apparently removed. In fact I have a hard time believing that a statement like this was just removed. I don't think it was there in the first place. But obviously this all happened a long time ago, so I guess we both have a hard time to proof what was written here.
And also, there is a big difference in between "Access seemed keen on bringing an AAX version of the plugin at first" and "looking into it" - so maybe you could choose your "quotes" a little more carefully.
well please get over it.
Risey obviously meant no disrespect.
Think of the pro tools users of which there are many of us, who can't use your product natively, and do something about it..
In fact, the 5 minutes you took making that reply could have been 5 minutes work on an aax version.
If you really wanted to, you could all huddle up and do it within a week.
I am GUESSING, not accusing but guessing, it is politics why you don't want to do it because you have to sign the avid pace developers form ( i am not exactly sure what this entails but i do know it's mandatory for aax).