hmm,
from a technical view i can't see any reason why AAX64 (as the only format of the "quasi standard" DAW plugin formats) should "not provides all functionality Virus Control needs to work". Beside the fact that AAX64 allows plugins to run in non-realtime (if they allow that) there is no (technical) major difference to other plugin infrastructures like VST, AU etc..If Virus Control Center could be ruined with AAX adapters which functionality should be left here? The only limitations are the limitations of the adaptors which are not limits by AAX specification - just lack of implementation att by the adaptor levels.I'm not up2date with the current SDKs from AVID nor their licensing politics, but i've heard that AVID has further restricted their policies for SDK users/partners.
May be there is the point here behind?The fact that Pro Tools 12 is coming in the next days while AAX is the new Pro Tool standard since PT11 and Pro Tools is "(at least) one of" the very major standards in professional audio industry should be enough motivation for a company which want to be the technical leader in plugout / plugin synth integration today (where nearly for any synth with a MIDI interface is an DAW integration plugin available...) to work on a AAX port/build of their flagship product, as nearly any audio plugin software company on stage today offered an AAX version out there adopted AAX for their products since the release of PT11. Even many small companies and one man shows was able to push out a AAX port of their plugin software. Pro Tools is (and with 12 will be more) used for music creation, production and sound design more and more today.