im confused - is the hardware in the TI simply 'forwards compatible 1.1' which is implicit since USB 2.0 hosts are backwards compatible...
OR
Is it a cheapy USB 2.0 device which actually cant run in high speed USB 2 (such that im surprised it even exists)...
I think the extra bandwidth would be more fun for routing audio outs, such that you can push them through the TI effects, etc...
Monomeester - I ask the question again, why are you associating the bandwidth of USB with parts? The polyphony of the virus has nothing to do with the USB or your ability to drive parts...
It DOES have something to do with being able to have different parts on different USB outs on the ASIO driver - But i'm sure that is not the only limiting factor, the USB is not the only channel on the chain from the inner workings of the DSP chip to your studio, more channels means more buffers means more bandwidth everywhere, not just the USB...